![]() ![]() ![]() The first principle states, “each person participating in a practice, or affected by it, has an equal right to the most extensive liberty for all.” This means those people should have as much freedom as possible, provided that their freedom doesn’t trample on the freedom of others in or affected by the system. ![]() John Rawls argues that justice can be conceptualized with two principles. Thus, in order to be just, there needs to be a mutual acknowledgment of claims. This must be a fair process: there needs to be a balance between competing claims. In practice at an institutional level, this means that the institution must take subjective claims and discern an objective truth from them. For something to be fair, no one can be exploited or made to submit to claims that appear illegitimate. ![]() Justice is based upon the concept of fairness. Rawls discusses justice on an institutional rather than an individual level. He spent many years refining his argument in a paper titled, “Justice As Fairness.” Definition of John Rawls' "Justice As Fairness" John Rawls, an American philosopher, argued that justice is fundamentally linked to the idea of fairness. What is justice? It’s often used in tandem with morality, goodness, legality, and order, but what distinguishes justice from these concepts? What factors do we take into account when determining if a course of action or past deed can accurately be called “just”? The Answer ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |